Showing posts with label Women in Love. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women in Love. Show all posts

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Women In Love

1969, 125 minutes, UK


Some films are remarkable for the impact they have on society when they are released. Often these titles do not age well as society moves one. Women In Love manages to be a great film now while being controversial for its time.

It tells the story of four people in the 1920s who meet and become lifelong friends, their free spirited attitude being what binds their friendship. Despite Gudrun (Glenda Jackson) marrying Gerald (Oliver Reed) and Rupert (Alan Bates) wedding Ursula (Jennie Linden), Gerald and Rupert engage in homoerotic naked wrestling. They develop a strong physical, mental and spiritual attraction which throws questions at their life choices. They all embark on a honeymoon in Switzerland which results in infidelity and a lasting tension on the friendships and marriage.

As I have said before, I am no literature expert and having never read a DH Lawrence novel in my life, I cannot say whether this film does the book justice. However, I can say that it really pushed the boundaries of British cinema during a time of sexual revolution and the liberation of attitudes. The famous scene of the naked Japanese wrestling clearing demonstrates this. Not only is the wrestling suggestively 'gay', it is also the first film approved by the BBFC to show full male nudity - the director did have to edit some of the penis shots. Surprisingly the censors were more concerned with nudity than the homosexuality despite this film being released two years after decriminalisation. I would have expected attitudes to be less accepting but I suppose they wanted to keep the artistic integrity of the original book.

I understand from other reviews that the film stays loyal to the book and does it justice. If this is the case, it is amazing how radical DH Lawrence was. The script, although can be slightly heavy and difficult to follow at times, is a constant philosophical conversation about the relationship between the sexes as well as whether marriage is a workable institution. I imagine this attitude was radical for the 1920s but certainly fits the liberation movement of the late 60s.

What really made this a classic piece of cinema is the performances. The four main characters were fantastic. Although at times they were melodramatic, it fitted with the script and the film. Jackson of course was the highlight and deservedly won the Oscar for Best Actress. I also enjoyed some of the lesser roles, in particular Eleanor Bron was entertaining as Hermione Roddice.

While often films can try to push the boundaries for the sake of it and therefore not age well as society moves on, Women In Love managed to challenge society's views and attitudes while still being an excellent film.

4/5 - Ground breaking cinema

Thursday, 29 September 2011

Time Shift - Dear Censor

BBC Four, 29 September 2011


I was expecting my next discs but they have yet to have arrived so I have decided to review a documentary that is on BBC Four tonight.

Time Shift - Dear Censor is an excellent documentary on the correspondence between the BBFC and film directors. It demonstrates how society's attitudes change and how the film censors have to cope with the responsibility of determining what the boundaries in taste and decency are.

Rebel Without a Cause, one of my favourite films, was one of the first to feature because they felt the parenting skills of James Dean were poor and could negatively influence society. This seems ludicrous in today's films but clearly an issue of the time.

I was surprised there was no real mention of censoring homosexuality (the Celluloid Closet is a better resource for this). Women in Love was the nearest but was more focused on the first male full frontal nudity.

BBFC developed its role to allow potentially offensive films, such as the haunting but excellent A Clockwork Orange, to receive approval because they are a work of art. As a committed libertarian, I agree no organisation should limit films just because the majority of the population would be offended.

This principle was particularly tested with Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom, which is the most disturbing film I have ever seen. But the correspondence with Pier Paolo Pasolini made the excellent point that it is a film to 'turn off' abuse rather than 'turn on'.

I was very interested in more recent films, such as Shortbus, which have pushed the boundaries again. However, we are not allowed to see any correspondence from the last 20 years so I hope the BBC will do this again to uncover the concerns of more modern classics.

I really enjoyed this step back in time and it gives a good grounding in the history of film, how society has changed and how governments deal with controversy in art.

If you have access to BBC iPlayer, I highly recommend it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/